Archive for category New Releases

Further Proof That Uwe Boll Is A Douche

Unlike many horror film fans, I only started disliking Uwe Boll within the past year.  Prior to my viewing of Seed, I hadn’t been exposed to any of Boll’s directorial prowess, which includes House of the Dead and other films ranked amongst the worst of all time via IMDB.  In case you haven’t seen it (hopefully you haven’t), Seed is about a prolific serial killer whose execution is botched via a faulty electric chair.  The prison guards bury him alive and of course he doesn’t die.  Instead he crawls out and goes on a killing spree.  Pretty standard cliche stuff.  The point of bringing Seed up here is that the first two minutes of the film is comprised of actual footage of animals being abused or slaughtered – stuff you’d see in PETA videos like skinned dogs in their death throes.  It’s absolutely horrific and unwatchable to me.  While I think it’s important to recognize that this type of ugliness exists in the world, Boll used the footage specifically to get a reaction, not because he had anything to say about cruelty or suffering.  He wanted his audience to be shocked by the violence shown and then take that mindset with them into his film.  Unfortunately, there’s nothing remotely interesting about watching Seed‘s cliche drivel and nothing that would show intelligence behind including the animal footage.  Shock value with no message or meaning.

Anyway, the talented Mr. Boll just released a trailer for his newest “shocking” piece of garbage, Auschwitz, which is obviously about the Holocaust and stars Boll as a Nazi guard.  As expected the trailer is horrific, featuring footage of people being gassed, a child’s body being burned and Boll pulling teeth out of a dead body.  At one point, the words “never forget” appear over a black backdrop.  What is so infuriating about this isn’t the fact that there’s going to be a film about the Holocaust that graphically depicts the atrocities that were committed.  I’m all for preserving the memory and awareness of these awful things.  What is infuriating is that Boll has the audacity to turn the Holocaust into what will likely amount to a torture porn flick and has the balls to say “never forget” in his trailer!  This guy has achieved a brand new level of douchiness never before seen.  I bet Boll will attempt to pass off this film as artistic or as making a statement about the Holocaust.  Don’t be fooled – we’re just looking at a hack director’s latest attempt to cause controversy in order to keep his name out there.  He’d actually be less of an ass if he was up front about just wanting to use the Holocaust as his backdrop for horror.  Mostly I get angry at this man’s pretentiousness, not his subject matter.  Maybe now’s the time to go ahead and sign the Stop Uwe Boll Petition.

Post to Twitter

, ,

No Comments

Interview With REC 2 Writer/Director Paco Plaza!

I’m not sure how my lucky number came up when the promoters of REC 2 were looking for bloggers to write about their film, but a couple weeks ago I was offered an advanced screener and an interview with writer/director Paco Plaza.  Surely, our humble blog here doesn’t rank amongst the horror blogosphere elite (check out our current HorrorBlips ranking haha), but I like to think that we do a good job with the limited time we have to devote.  So, that said, I was very pleased to receive the interview invite.  Chris and I watched the film and came up with some (I think) thoughtful questions that we figured would interest our readers.  As I’m sure you already know, REC 2 picks up right where the first film left off, placing us behind the lenses in the same apartment complex overrun with its killer residents.  Here is the interview:

I was interested to see that there are plans to make this series into a foursome with “Apocalypse” and “Genesis.” What aspects about REC inspired a saga and what concepts do you think will hold an audience through four films?

After the release and success of the first film, we began to think it was worth developing the cosmology we had created. When we thought about it, we decided to rescue some ideas that were already planted. For the example, the demonic possession left a lot to explore. And that’s what we’re now doing, with each film we want to give twists and turns and have the story go beyond imagination.

Recently, the first person hand held camera style has become popular. What do you think it is about this style that has captivated audiences?

I don’t know; maybe the POV offers a deeper implication, linked with other languages like TV or videogames that a young audience is familiar with. And it’s much cheaper, and that has no doubt captivated producers.

Will all four movies maintain the “first person” hand-held camera style?

No, that will change.

Anything you can tell about the direction the saga is going to take?

No, sorry. We think part of the success has been hiding our cards until the premiere, and we want to keep it like that. All I can say is that I’m writing the prequel with Luis Berdejo, we’re working really hard in making it the funniest and scariest of the three.

Should American audiences expect to see any of the three new films finding themselves into American remakes?

I don’t know.  It depends on American producers.

What makes REC 2 unique from its predecessor and the other films of the first person camera style?

I think its mix of genres; in fact, it is a film spliced in two. Our model on this was James Cameron’s Aliens and its turn into action.  We wanted to play with different POV’s and have flash-back, a bunch of new and playful elements. It’s not as strict as the first one.

Zombie horror has become a leading genre these days and I feel REC was pigeonholed into that genre. What about the REC saga transcends that genre?

Possibly that both REC films contain really strong views on Spanish society. They deal important matters such as racism and media manipulation.

What do you envision as being the “next big thing” (genre, style, etc) in horror?

I don’t know. What I’ve enjoyed is the end of those awful torture movies with pointless violence involved. We’re lucky that is over.

What did you use as blood in REC 2?  It’s very realistic.

At certain moments its real pig blood; many times (when in contact with the actors) is just a special composition, a secret formula David Ambit (FX) will never share.

During the writing process of the first film, was the religious/demon angle always the intended direction?

Yes, that is the background we created; at the end of the first REC we somehow gave a lot of clues, in the tape, in the newspapers on the wall…everything was already there.

Some might view REC and REC 2 as critical of the Catholic church.  Was it your intention to make a statement about the church?

Not at all. We both are big fans of The Exorcist, I agree it’s one of the best films ever made; we loved the idea of showing that our creatures were not zombies, and in the end of REC we had sawed the idea of a demonic possession happened in Portugal. I’m a practicing Catholic, but Jaume is not, and I think the approach to the subject of possession for us was more aesthetic than religious.

[End Interview]

First, a statement – I greatly appreciate being offered this interview and I think Mr. Plaza gave us good, honest answers to the questions.  However, I’d be remiss if I didn’t say that he omitted some of our more “difficult” questions, namely:

  • The Catholic Church is an organization founded on spirituality and uses it to explain our reality.  Given this, in REC 2, why are they trying to find a scientific explanation for something that is always considered a religious/spiritual matter?
  • There seems to be a bit of confusion regarding the role the viewer is supposed to play in REC 2 considering we are watching several different pieces of video captured from multiple devices.  Is this “found footage”?  And if so, why did the editor of the footage choose to keep elements like battery meters and other viewfinder text on the final print?

As you may guess, these two questions reflect my main criticisms of REC 2 and I would love to have had Plaza’s opinion on them, but I can understand that there are plot holes and certain leaps of faith (no pun intended) that we’re expected to take as viewers.  What did you think of REC 2 and were you able to get past these flaws?

[REC] 2 is now available on VOD, VUDU, Xbox Marketplace Playstation Network, Amazon and will be in theaters July 9th.  Check out the official website at Rec2themovie.com and if you haven’t already seen it, watch the trailer below.

Post to Twitter

1 Comment

Paranormal Activity 2 Trailer

Please Put me in the Sequel! I'm READY to Bust ghosts this time!

Please Put me in the Sequel! I'm READY to Bust ghosts this time!

Another interesting little tidbit about going to see Eclipse the other night was that I got to catch the Paranormal Activity 2 teaser. Of course, I’m not thrilled, but I am a bit curious. After panning the original as a substance-less jump-fest that provided most of its horror from the on screen attempts at believable acting by Sloat and Featherston, I am not dying to see the sequel as much as those who fell for the first hype factory. What does strike me about the trailer is that it seems to be keeping true to the original format.

Those of us that grew up with the original “con-artist” of the horror genre Blair Witch may remember that their attempt at a sequel produced the all too ordinary Blair Witch 2 : Book of Shadows, which threw the first person hand held cam idea out the window and the novelty and allure with it. Of  course, “found footage” and “first person narratives” were new and, at the time, no one thought they would become trendy. Today, PA2 has more of luxury to keep with their roots and while the teaser offers little insight into what direction the film will take, it does seem to promise that it will  remain in the style of its predecessor.

What we do see in the teaser is a dog and baby reacting to an unseen force. The German Shepard, already showing better acting skills than Sloat, growls at the air as the baby stands up in the crib. After a cut and a sound spike, a dark haired girl (maybe Featherston?) looms in the doorway. The child and dog have vanished, but if you look in the mirror you can see an image of the child remains. Oooh creepy.

As George W. Bush once said, “Fool me once shame on….you…If you fool me, you can’t be fooled again.” Point being that Paranormal Activity fooled us all once with their sound spikes and tiny little scratches on Featherston’s thigh, so if we’re willing to jump to see this second one it’s shame on us.  They need to come up with something really clever to create the swarm of bees buzz that fueled the first one’s success, and I will be the first one to applaud them if they do. Until then I’ll remain skeptical about the paranormal.

Post to Twitter

,

No Comments

Let Me In Trailer Released – This Just Isn’t The “Right” One

As you’ve probably seen on a variety of other blogs and movie sites, the first trailer has been released for Matt Reeves’ Let Me In, the upcoming remake to the much acclaimed (and personal favorite) Let The Right One In.  I’ve been dreading this thing since hearing about it more than a year ago and while this trailer hasn’t inspired rage in me, it has only furthered my suspicion that this film will be a completely unnecessary rehash of the original.  Based on the shots included in the trailer, it seems that Reeves has worked to keep a lot of Tomas Alfredson’s stylistic dark imagery and maintain the tone of John Ajvide Lindqvist’s novel but something seems, well, wrong to me here.  The source material was never meant to be set to some moody rock song, Colorado just isn’t Sweden, and I don’t remember Oskar to be the kind of kid to whisper “do you think there’s such a thing as evil?”

Beyond those surface details and nit-picky complaints, I have doubts that Reeves will have the balls to explore the uncomfortable topics of sexual attraction amongst pre-teens, pedophilia, castration, and gender confusion in his remake.  These are the elements that make the book and original film so disturbing and intriguing.  I think that, best case scenario, we’ll end up with a film about loneliness with a vampire twist.  But wait, we already have that and so much more.

Post to Twitter

3 Comments

The Human Centipede: A Film That Doesn’t Need This Subtitle

cent4Recent studies have shown that the same part of the human brain “fires” when a person watches another person doing something as if the viewer himself was actually performing the task.  This is why people become fanatical over sports and video games. Horror has always functioned on the same principal, but instead of craving vicarious excitement, the viewer desires fear. Historically, directors have always fed their audiences’ fear by having the viewer identify with a character and then force that character to encounter abnormal bodily shapes or distorted faces. Everything from Romero’s zombies to rubber walking skeletons in a Vincent Price flick have tricked audiences to believing that danger was their own. While other movies rely on “jumps” and the recently, and unfortunately popular, torture-horror genre rely on tickling the wince reflex, every horror film functions on the infamous fear of fear itself.

While every horror film relies on the viewer becoming fearful of the same thing the character fears, last night’s viewing of Tom Six‘s The Human Centipede (First Sequence) had me struggling to decide if I could be afraid of being kidnapped by a crazy doctor and having my mouth sown to my friend’s anus, and having to digest the food that he eats out of another person’s anus. The Human Centipede pushes the boundaries of what a viewer can relate to, and after you’re done with this one you’ll either scratch your head and let out a long “oookay” or turn to whoever else is in the room and say “let’s never speak of it, again.”  However, I’m getting very far ahead of myself.

How do two dippy American girls get sown together mouth to anus to a Japanese dude they don’t know? Actually, this one starts off with very cliched format: Lindsay (Ashley C. Williams) and Jenny (Ashlynn Yennie) are touring Germany on their way to a club when they get lost followed of course by flat a tire and a cellphone with no signal. Pretty standard. After an arugment full of dialogue that makes you glad they can’t speak for the entire second half of the movie, they set off for help. Somehow, instead of just following the road back, after the camera cuts you discover they’re both in the middle of the woods until they stumble upon a single house; and, yes, it is a dark and stormy night, but It really doesn’t matter how many cliches pile up here, because no one is every going to use “Centipede” and “unoriginal” in the same sentence.

As horrible luck would have it, the house happens to belong to the evil and eccentric Dr Heiter (Dieter Laser) who has ironically been waiting for two more people to sew to the guy he has in the basement already. What luck! The rest is standard. He drugs and binds the two girls and then, after a failed escaped sequence, does his newly developed procedure, which locks the knees into the bent position and attaches the three victim’s disgestive tracks together – say it with me this time – mouth to anus, mouth to anus. Fortunately for the Japanese guy he is chosen for the front, but the girls have the unfortunate task of having to “process” what he eats.

While this sounds like a cheap attempt to tickle the gag re-flex in a “two girls-a guy-a centipede and cup” sort of way, the film barely scraps the surface of the gross imagery that it has the potential to. The most tense scene, involves the Japanese man crying and begging for forgiveness in his native language as he announces to the girls that he “has to shit.” The girl in the middle’s cheeks puff a little and her throat muscles contract, but that’s as gross as it gets.

humancentFor some viewers, the implication of what’s going on here may be too much to take but the film rates pretty low on my disturbing meter. For one, Dr. Hieter makes the entire experience almost Monty Pythonish. He prances around in what a Nazi might wear to go horse back riding and a formed fitted lab coat while either kissing his own reflection or gloating over his creation while yelling stuff like ”Yes, Feed her!”  Either that or he’s just looming over the shot, hanging out and being creepy while looking like the love child of Christopher Walken and the Muppet “Sweetums.”

No matter how ridiculous the film becomes in its absurdist theater-meets-horror-kinda-way, Centipede still has a touch of realism that keeps you somehow believing the ridiclous spectacle you’re witinessing. Instead of making Heiter a Jigsaw-esque super villian that outsmarts the authorties, his insanity often causes him to be a bumbling out of control character. In fact, Heiter has been sloppy enough with his victims to earn the police attention before the film’s narrative even starts and many problems I had with the whole procedure in general were addressed. For example, I wondered, wouldn’t the last girl on the chain, either get poisoned or get a massive infection? Well, they actually go that route by having Jenny fall ill with a puss swollen face. In this aspect the film succeeds by introducing a flawed nut-case instead of tyring to create a new untouchable horror icon, the viewer can more easily acccept the pitter patter of a human centipede feet crawling through his brain. (However, there is a sequel in the works).                           

The finale to this whole-crazy-thang is kinda pulled out of someone’s ass–pardon the pun– as the Japanese lead-man confesses a shameful act and comits a unwarranted action but at that point you’re not going to question an unlikely twist. Trust me. Still, originality goes a long way these days, and this film certainly has lots of originality going on. I can’t say it had my fear receptors firing on all cylinders it but had a great freak show feel without flaunting gore and grossness for a cheap wince. Centipede is a peek into good old fashison insanity, and maybe it proposes a new kind of fear: a fear of wondering about what type unimagined suffering is possible in this world no matter how absurb….Nah! It’s probably the thought of these two getting it on to produce THAT!

Post to Twitter

,

1 Comment

Splice’s Trailer Lied to You All!

DrenOn May 10th, I found myself initially intrigued by Splice’s movie poster, and then subsequently rolling my eyes at the trailer. Readers of the review I posted will remember my panning of it as just another cliched attempt to rehash Mary Shelley’s format and splice it with modern problems in order to sell a Sci-Fi horror film. After sitting down with this flick, on a Tuesday afternoon with the ten other people that were only willing to chance seeing it with discounts ticket prices, I discovered I was wrong and had, in haste, committed the crime everyone’s kindergarten teacher warns about with that stupid adage of books and covers. Instead, I found myself watching a character driven piece about a romantic couple, Sarah Polley and Adrian Brody, who create a specimen, “Dren”, with human and animal DNA after their employing company refusing to support that taboo line of research. Why did I jump to conclusions about it being a cheap genre piece? Frankly, because, the trailer went out of its way to market it that way.

Splice isn’t even a horror film, but you’d be hard pressed to figure that out from the trailer’s dark music, sound spikes, and clever editing that indicates a film loaded with creepy jump scenes. Trust me, there aren’t many and the trailer actually manufactures jump scenes by inserts sound spikes and cuts where there are none. With the except of the last five minutes that takes one of the films notorious twists, little argument can be made about calling Splice a horror film. Again, it’s not.

splice-2So what is Splice? Well, its mostly an examination of genetic engineering and the possible effects it could have on the people who dare to mess around with it. This is fair warning for people who get annoyed at preachy-ness this film and its “what’s the worst that can happen” line/motif are very ANTI-genetic engineering.  However, the film does make a good case. Well, sometimes…

The problem that remains is that Splice tackles issues and character development within its run time of one hour, forty-four that you’d be hard press to cover in two hours and forty-four. Instead of well calculated development, the audience experiences WTF moments about every twenty minutes as the story unloads a tall house cards worth of twists with very little ground floor to support it. (I’ll give the minor spoiler alert, here, but this film doesn’t really have any Sixth Sense caliber delivery so don’t feel that shy about reading on.)

While the audience is offered a key-hole glance into a Polley’s character’s childhood, an abusive mother, it is hard to believe the transition of her attitude towards the clone “Dren,” which one moment has her treating Dren as her child and in the next Polley starts ripping pages out of Kathy Bate’s Misery playbook. Also, some scenes hint at an attraction between Brody’s character and Dren, but when Polley catches him doing something with Dren that Hallmark doesn’t make an apology card for it tends to feel rushed and unbelievable. When you’re in the theater scratching your head saying “Really?”, it’s never a good sign. While the twists did offer an interesting texture and depth of intellect to the storyline, they were always delivered without enough precedence to make them anywhere near believable.

Eventually after a few more WTF moments, the tension revolving around how Dren should be treated paired with Brody and Polley’s company pushing for results leads up to a final twist that is obviously coming after it’s blantantly foreshadowed. I just yawned as it went down and took the last transition numbly while receiving the trailer’s promise of  a horror film, a least for five minutes. Then it’s over, and we have  to hear that “what’s the worst that can happen” line one final time.

Worth watching? Kinda. It was different, and different goes far in my book these days, but “rushed” is never a word you want a critic to describe your story line with and that’s the only way I can describe it at film’s end. However, if you’re in the mood for something out of the ordinary then go check it out. What’s the worst that can happen?

Post to Twitter

,

No Comments

‘Survival’ Theaterical Release- Not Quite A Zombie Plague Sweeping the Nation

survival_of_the_dead01Tonight, May 28 2010, marks the national theatrical release of George A. Romero’s Survival of the Dead, but don’t expect zombies to be tearing up the screens from coast to coast. The limited release will be placing Romero’s latest flesh feast in only about twenty cities,  (Listed below) which seem to be only working out for Cali that has seven theaters hosting the much maligned movie. However, if you are a die-hard Romero freak somewhere in the middle of the country you’re pretty much left out in the cold.

However, I stand by what I said in my review of the film: I enjoyed it, but I recognize that it may disappoint. So don’t travel for this one; hit it up on of the digital rental mediums first and then gauge how many miles you want to trek for it. And there’s no need to feel guilty about it. To paraphrase Romero himself, speaking to Fangoria on the reverse release to VOD before theater, “this method is perhaps the best preview for a film ever” and “I’m glad it’s out there and available for people.” In short, George says its okay to watch on your PS3 or Xbox before you drive halfway across the country to see it.

1) Atlanta, GA: Midtown Art Cinemas 8
2) Cambridge, MA: Kendall Square Cinema
3) Durham, NC: Carolina Theatre – Durham
4)Chicago, IL: Music Box
5)Austin, TX: Alamo Drafthouse South Lamar
6)Denver, CO: Mayan Theatre
7)Santa Ana, CA: South Coast Village 3
8)San Diego, CA: Ken Cinema
9)West Los Angeles, CA: Nuart Theatre
10)Minneapolis, MN: Lagoon Cinema
11)New Haven, CT: Criterion Cinemas 7
12)Hartford, CT: Real Art Ways Cinema
13)New York, NY: Village East Cinemas
14)Philadelphia, PA: Ritz at the Bourse
15)Seattle, WA: Varsity Theatre
16)Santa Cruz, CA: Del Mar Theatre 4
17)San Francisco, CA: Lumiere Theatre 3
18)Berkeley, CA: Shattuck Cinemas 10
19)San Jose, CA: Camera 12
20)University City, MO: Tivoli Theatre
21)Washington, DC: E Street Cinema

Post to Twitter

,

No Comments

Splice – Frankenstein Rears His Ugly Head, Again

splicemoviestillFor those of you who haven’t caught the trailer, Splice is a sci-fi/horror flick that intends to tackle the recent stem-cell research debate with a part human, part scorpion, part ostrich thing? Sounds confusing, but Splice runs a significant risk of being a bad cliche before the trailer’s even over.

The plot follows two scientists, Elsa and Clive, (Sarah Polley and Adrien Brody) that find a loop hole in genetic engineering laws by creating a non-human species mix with the mentality that a new species won’t have legislation against testing on it. After a quick glance at the trailer, or people with enough common sense to fill a thimble will realize that this creature is going to escape and run-amuck in downtown Tokyo. Well, everything but those last three are true and logically obvious.

Sound interesting? Well, maybe it will be, but Splice functions by attempting to put modern twists and problems on an iconic tale. This becomes problematic because Mary Shelley casts a big shadow as her novel explored the dilemma of out of control science and what type of soul comes to Earth with the creatures we create. While her inspiration came from Galvani and Volta hooking up batteries to dead frogs, the moral debate of what we’re messing with have changed very little.

The trailer gives a peek of Brody’s character referring to their creation as a “specimen,” which draws an angry “don’t her call her that” from Polley. While the subtext is intended to be powerful, I have doubts that a sci-fi/horror thriller can carry weighty questions and please genre fans. Call me a cynic, but the last person to pull this off was Shelley herself. It’s bad enough that since 1910 we wouldn’t let the original monster stay dead. Until 2000, every decade has had at least some form of Frankenstein movie but every attempt to modernize this concept has been mediocre at best. Fans of the Species franchise (if there are any left after the last two straight to DVD releases) can testify to that.

Regardless, Splice is, at very least, not another unnecessary sequel or slasher remake which is refreshing in its own way, but my pessimism is going to win out on this one until June 4th when it hits the screen. That Friday we can all go see if Hollywood has created another abomination.

Post to Twitter

, ,

2 Comments

NOES Reboot And The Platinum Dunes Movie Release Process

Picture 3

Over the past 7 months, I’ve been on a Platinum Dunes patented ride to a movie release.  The process goes like this:

  1. Initial teaser trailer released for legendary horror franchise being rebooted.  Said trailer is dark, ominous, and throws in just enough franchise nods appearing to have been updated for the current year.
  2. I think, “Hey, that looks like it could be all right!”
  3. Stills are gradually released, usually capturing iconic scenes being remade or title character looking horrifying.
  4. The horror community is likely divided on the new film – some excitement, some skepticism.
  5. Full length trailer is released.  Said trailer includes teaser trailer footage, attractive 20-somethings, bits of over-dramatic dialogue, and periods of silence broken with loud “bang” noises.
  6. I think, “Shit! Looks like they might have fooled me again.  I’ll still give it a shot though.”
  7. I see said film, knowing it will be terrible.  And it is.
  8. I think, “I’ll never see one of those shitty Platinum Dunes remakes again.”
  9. [INSERT REBOOT TITLE HERE] is announced.
  10. Process begins anew.

nightmare-elm-st-poster-1So you may have guessed it already – I think the A Nightmare on Elm Street reboot was utter crap.  I’m not going to dance around this one, trying to find and highlight the bright moments in an effort to be fair.  This movie failed on nearly every level.  Where do I start?  How about the fact that Platinum Dunes took this iconic film, stripped it of all atmosphere, dumbed-down its best moments, and transformed it into another run-of-the-mill horror release?  There are next to no scary scenes here, save for one or two where director Samuel Bayer actually allows suspense to build for more than 2 seconds.  Everything else rapidly builds toward inevitable jump scares (punctuated by those great “bang” noises again) that you can see coming way before they happen.  Nothing is surprising and somehow, they’ve managed to discard that eerie “is this a dream or reality” atmosphere of the original film.

On top of this, the best scenes aren’t executed well and they come off as having been thrown in out of obligation.  They even had the balls to modify the scene where Tina is dragged across the ceiling by Freddy’s claw.  Here, she gets thrown around the room a few times, hovers over the bed, gets slashed and falls down dead.  We don’t actually ever see what’s happening on the dream side, like in the original.  You would think they could have executed this one better than the original given the enhancements in technology, but honestly I think old-school effects will always prevail over CGI.  Check out this comparison and tell me if you agree:

The plot is a slightly modified rehash of the original, so I don’t have too many complaints there.  Though, I do have some beef with the nonsense idea (as explained by a character in the film reading out of a textbook) that after 70 hours of sleeplessness, the human body falls into a coma.  It has been well documented that people have stayed awake for as many as 264 hours – 11 days – with no ill effects.  I don’t know why that annoyed me so much, but it did.  Probably because half of the audience will believe it is true.

a_nightmare_on_elm_street_2010_1200x499_577306What about Freddy?  The writers do call into question his guilt and also turn him from a child murderer into a supposed child molester.  I didn’t mind that change as, in a way, there’s something more perverse and disgusting about molestation.  If anything, this angle provided a way for Jackie Earle Haley to explore a decidedly different character than Robert Englund’s.  Unfortunately, that aspect of Krueger’s personality goes undeveloped.  I think there was real potential for him to be creepy and downright gross here but the writers wimped out, probably wanting to keep things just “safe” enough for mainstream America to buy tickets.  I can think of only one scene toward the end where Krueger’s true motivations and perversions are apparent.  Otherwise, they’re just something that happened in the past, off screen and uninteresting.  Instead, the writers have Haley’s gravelly voice uttering lines like, “Why are you screaming?  I haven’t even cut you yet.”  But don’t blame Haley.  Blame the writers.  All that he and the other actors had to work with was a below average pop-horror script.  They did fine for the most part, save for a few extraordinarily corny moments.

Visually, A Nightmare on Elm Street had some strong moments – a snowy bedroom and blood soaked hallway come to mind – but I didn’t leave the theater pondering its cinematography.  It adequately executed dozens of cliche images, if that’s what you’re going for.  I’m not.  I want something that’s going to stick with me for days.  While watching a scene involving a “creepy” little girl, I couldn’t help but think of The Shining and how Kubrick excelled with his twins.  That image still freaks me out to this day.  The ones in A Nightmare on Elm Street will be forgotten before I fall asleep tonight.

This was more of what we’ve come to expect from Platinum Dunes and I’m done watching their crappy bastardizations of genre legends.  I just heard they’re planning on remaking The Monster Squad.  Hey, that looks like it could be all right!

Post to Twitter

, , , ,

3 Comments

The Dark Tower: A Ron Howard Film? Color Me Skeptical.

darktower1News is hitting the blogosphere this morning that Ron Howard and producer Brian Grazer and writer/producer Akiva Goldsman have purchased the film rights to Stephen King’s The Dark Tower - easily my favorite books he’s written.  Previously, J.J. Abrams had purchased the rights from King for $19 (you’ll know the significance if you’ve read the books) but returned them to the author after realizing he wouldn’t be able to do the series justice.  It is being reported that Howard intends to shoot a movie that will lay the foundation for a TV series.

While I think The Dark Tower deserves some kind of film adaptation, this news makes me nervous for a couple of reasons.  In my ideal world, each book from The Dark Tower series would be made into a series of HBO or Showtime episodes ala True Blood (well, minus all the vampire sex).  I really don’t see any other way to do the books justice because of their intricate plot layers, flashbacks, and character depth.  Inevitably, any kind of adaptation will inspire ire from fans for one reason or another but I think an HBO approach would significantly reduce complaints.  Howard seems to be talking regular cable, which really sucks.  The Dark Tower books are often gritty, violent, and sexual.  Obviously they’re going to lose most of that by airing on NBC or something.

Also, is Howard really the right director?  He’s brilliant and responsible for some great films but how will the director of The Da Vinci Code treat our epic hero, Roland?  I felt more comfortable with Abrams owning the rights as he is a more experienced sci-fi/horror genre director and writer.  Then again, he did write Armageddon and Mission Impossible III.  Bah.  I guess I’m one of those ire-filled fans I was just writing about.  I’ll never be completely satisfied with the end product, I’m sure.  Let’s just hope this doesn’t go the route of IT – a great and very violent/graphic book dulled down by network television.  Do our boy Roland some justice, will ya?

Post to Twitter

, , ,

3 Comments